M&A Critique

Annual M&A Happenings 2015-2016

Industry-wise breakup of the schemes filed during the year April 2015 to March 2016:

Industry TOTAL TOTAL
No. of Deals from
April 2015 to March 2016
No. of Deals from
April 2014 to March 2015
Auto Components 3
Agriculture 5
Financial Services 26 24
Investments 17 31
Information Technology 26 22
Infrastructure 5
Publication 3
Food Products 4
Pharmaceutical Products 3 13
Real Estate 44 46
Chemicals 12 2
Power 6 8
Electronics 3
Travel Support Services 3
Textile 5
Telecommunication 0 7
Engineering 9 11
Others 64 121
Total 238 285

During the previous year April 2015 to March 2016, 238 (Two Hundred and Thirty Eight) Schemes were filed.

Annual M&A Happenings 2015-2016

The diagram shows that the Real Estate sector had the maximum numbers of deals cracked during the last one year with 44 deals in total, followed by Financial Services and Information Technology sectors with 26 deals each and Investments sector with 17 deals.  ‘Others’ includes various sectors like Infrastructure, Jewelry, Media and Auto Components to name a few. Some other important details regarding Schemes filed during the previous year April 2015 to March 2016.

No. of Listed Companies who have filled the scheme 39
No. of companies having paid up capital of more than Rs. 10 crore 154
No. of mergers schemes between holding and subsidiary companies 87
No. of schemes in which Transferor Company has carried forward losses and the Transferee Company is profit making 102
No. of schemes in which Transferor Company was profit making and the Transferee Company has carried forward losses 68
No. of schemes in which Transferor Company and the Transferee Company both have carried forward losses 86

Analysis:

  • There were 87 schemes between holding and subsidiary companies, i.e. these companies have gone in for internal restructuring. There has been a trend of a merger between holding and subsidiary company to gain from the synergy of resources.
  • There were 102 schemes in which Transferor Company had carried forward losses and the Transferee Company was profit making, thus  the Transferee Company was able to acquire those companies at low prices while the Transferor Companies were able to exit business by gaining fair value for their loss-making business.
  • There were 68 schemes in which Transferor Company was profit making and the Transferee Company had carried forward losses, which were reverse mergers. Thus the Transferee Companies were able to seek relief under section 72A of Income-tax Act.
  • There were 86 schemes in which Transferor Company and the Transferee Company both had carried forward losses, thus the companies were mainly aiming at a joint revival of the both transferor and transferee companies through the said schemes.

Do you think we missed some schemes? Let us know in the comment section below. For Details of schemes you can visit mergersindia

print

Nitin Gutka